Currently, our Mayor clearly wears at least two distinct hats – the second hat is as the long-term (20+ years) co-founder and Executive Director of the locally-based NGO (Non-Government Organization) known as WildCoast/CostaSalvaje.

When a critical matter involving an issue of long-term local government’s environmental concerns comes before City Council, as in the pending and oft-times contentious LCP/GP for instance, I strongly believe our Mayor should respectfully withdraw (“recuse”) from voting on the matter because he is obviously conflicted in his dual roles as Executive Director and Mayor.

The Mayor’s NGO has accepted $100,000s in donations from the California Coastal Commission (CCC) over the last decade – this directly benefitting his own salary and other compensation potential as its Executive Director. The CCC is also directly attempting to effectively “manipulate” the City’s current LCP to include Managed Retreat – an adaption strategy adamantly rejected by local residents and property owners in Imperial Beach since November 2018. The CCC provided a grant of $225,000 to assist the City in updating the outdated 1994 General Plan/LCP.

This conflict IS real - even if the Mayor had never mentioned a word about the matter at the City Council level. But, in fact, he did! In the last July 17, 2019 City Council meeting while pulling and discussing Consent Calendar item 4.6 – City’s continued State of Emergency regarding the TRV issue. In fact, the Mayor specifically recounted - as part of his public testimony - a meeting “over a year ago” that he and now Councilmember Paloma had with an official of the Mexican government (this was clearly a WildCoast meeting with Mexican officials as Paloma Aguirre had not even been elected to the City Council at that time!).

Whether or not there is a law that requires him to withdrawal is really not the point. The point is that he is “conflicted” — he has obligations to at least two different constituencies and he cannot represent both of them equitably in such a matter! Remember, his NGO role pays him at least six times (in excess of $125K) his part-time City Mayor’s salary.

The Mayor must therefore deal with this conflict in a responsible and ethical manner, and the way to do this is to withdraw from the LCP/GP vote before the City Council considers it later this fall - this action is often referred to as recusal. This act of recusal was, in fact, recently employed again by Councilmember Mark West in regard to the Mike Hess Brewery Phase II beer garden approval/vote at the Feb. 19, 2020 City Council meeting.

A similar conundrum is also still confronting Councilwoman Aguirre, a recently highly-compensated employee of the locally-based, non-profit WildCoast organization. She too should follow the Mayor and recuse herself from this obvious potential for conflict of interest concerns. If a City official is ever in doubt about what to do, he/she should seek specific legal guidance from the City’s Attorney Jennifer Lyon.


Long-time resident & property owner in Imperial Beach

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.